vasupmeter.blogg.se

Fxpansion geist 2 vs arturia spark 2
Fxpansion geist 2 vs arturia spark 2









fxpansion geist 2 vs arturia spark 2

Not to bad but a bit thin to my ears ( and the gui for me is to big for my screen)īattery: really like the sound, really like the fx but i also find it a little clunky. Tremor - another synthetic sounds machine. Often sample paths are lost when reopening. Spark - Runs like a donkey on my machine. I was curious anout 'Guru', i didn't know about that one i have used geist but it's a bit of a mess in it's current incarnation.

fxpansion geist 2 vs arturia spark 2

Personally, i have been trying Stix out, interesting synthesised drum machine. Interesting how many people use 808/909 clones. That's not happening : ) i have a midi controller but that' s it. More music and less fiddling around.ĭigitakt = £699. I don't have anything but the aforementioned 4 installed in my music production system now. and whatnot is just too much distraction from the real work. Battery with a couple of really good sample banks can give you great sounding results far more easily and faster.Įverything else I tried like Guru, Geist, Poise, Tremor. When I started using them I realised that to make great mixes you have to process them rather heavily and best with outboard hardware. It's rather complicated to get a really good sound with them. For when I feel like processing the sounds with my samplers and hardware FX. I've tried many other rhythm machines for acoustic drums and this one just sits right for my needs.ĭ16 Drumazon and Nepheton for "authentic" 808 and 909 electronic drums.

fxpansion geist 2 vs arturia spark 2

I'm not a big fan of its internal FX, either. It's got many different MIDI patterns that work really well as starting points, and separate outputs per sound so you can treat them with the FX of your choice. It's rather fast and easy to get what you want with it. XLN Addictive Drums 1 and 2 for acoustic drums. It doesn't have a sequencer, but hey that's what your DAW is here for, eh? I've tried using many other VST rhythm machines, but Battery just beats them all, in my case. Just route the sounds out through its many outputs for external treatment. Especially 3, easy and fast workflow, great sound. NI Battery 3 and 4 for sampled electronic drums. VST drum machines? My list for VST drums is pretty boring and not very long. My Verdict - Go with Native Instruments, and save up for a small mpc60 #bestofbothworlds

#Fxpansion geist 2 vs arturia spark 2 ps3#

Has the least features, its just an FL internal VST, light on cpu, no distracting submenus, as many outputs as you can route, ugly, no built in browser(which is a plus for me), works with almost every midi capable interface (i can do beats with my ps3 controller, which is nice ), be careful,each pad gets triggered with its own attack curve, hard to explain but imagine FL WaveShaper kind of distortion, when triggering pads with a velocity of 127 Coming from the oldschool MPC2000xl i can definitely HEAR if a beat was made in Maschine, nonetheless, if you have the bucks AND the enviroment, its a no brainer, NI Complete integration is the biggest plus imhoīattery - Many features, clunky Output Routing, up to 128 pads i think, a bit CPU heavier, its an overall toolbox, sound nice if you have the factory library, is quite intuitive with the menus, you can make own drumlayouts rather quickly,Īkai MPC - Ugly, Clunky Output Routing, it really helps if you already have a hardware mpc, quite nice expansionas, but nearly not as many as maschine Maschine - Most features, best workflow integration with its hardware counterpart, if you do more edm, thats for you. Ill try to make it short-and maybe it helps Well it depends, there are two major players, Battery and Maschine, then theres Akai Mpc and the underwhelmed FL FPC











Fxpansion geist 2 vs arturia spark 2